The Forked-Tongue Derailment
(of the Police, Investigators, Media, General Public
and possibly & YOU!)
I have never seen a group of people, that have successfully
derailed so many people before, for such a long time. I am not trying
to embarrass the "derailed" because they were so easily deceived
and therefore seemingly gullible. If gullible is the trait word used
to describe the mind or individual, which accepts the words that this
Cult speaks as being the honest truth for the face value, than I must
be the most simple minded person. I was deceived by the words of the
Cult so much, that I had once been a member of this group for almost
In this article I want to inform and teach you how this group thinks.
To confirm the things I am saying you will need to check out the references
or directions I give you.
First let us look at the rules. Now let us look
at the defense of these rules. Turn now to the Kenosha
News article and scroll down to the heading "Pastor
defends church." We need to consider what O'Shea meant or said in "I
don't believe in rules" and that he doesn't have any for its members.
Go to the Gospel Trumpet (Nov-Dec
issue), and turn
to page five. There Caitlin O'Shea, his eight year old daughter, names
off a few thing which are on the rules sheet. Did she just make up
some things from her imagination that nobody ever even thought about
or was she repeating something that was taught? Then on page twelve,
football is classified with other worldly idols. Does it fit the rules
sheet or does it fit with what O'Shea said about "no rules?" Does
it appear that he is lying or trying to deceive?
Now look at the last highlighted sentence on page
twelve. "If you
see a loose, ungoverned people who are so "free" that there
is no law, then judge them bound..." Does not that contradict with
what O'Shea said about no rules?
Turn to the excommunication
letter, second page,
last sentence of first paragraph. "Any among us who do not fully
comply with and obey this ban against you
will come under the same until they repent." Read the entire letter
and let me know how that could not be a rule. Was Pat O'Shea lying when
he said thee are NO Rule? Why do all other churches and organizations
have rules and yet O'Shea doesn't have any?
Like I already said, I am writing this article to educate the reader
on how this Cult thinks and says things. The Cult is like a Serpent with
a forked-tongue. Most people understand the right side of the tongue,
but unknowingly they are actually listening to them speaking something
totally different out of the left side. Let me explain.
Turn to the Kenosha News again to the "Pastor
defends Church" section.
I am presuming that O'Shea was asked about the accusation I have about
him beating my boys with the paddle he made. He answered by saying, "Never,
Never, Never,"... "If I saw one of those (a stick being used
on a child), I would cut it up and throw it away."
Now if you believe the tongue on the right side for what it sounds like,
then you are derailed. On the surface he answered in such a way that
you are compelled to think he is a mild man that couldn't even lovingly
discipline a child. However, this example is a simple one to see through,
since his wife in the following paragraphs exposed the left side of this
forked tongue fraud. Notice also how smoothly Pat O'Shea didn't even
answer the question. He didn't answer if he beat any child with an object,
but just said what he would do with the paddle now since he is being
questioned. Take note of that style of deception.
My first harsh awakening to this Cult was when Ralph
Salz died. He had been a member when he had a stroke while living in
the assistant pastor's house. The Church "Brothers" took
care of him for about two weeks, since he was mostly paralyzed or at
least unable to move. I will never forget the night that he died. At
the time my family and I lived in the upstairs of that house. My wife
and I were awakened and told that Salz just passed away.
Assistant pastors house we lived in the upstairs part of the house on
On the right is the pastor Pat O'Shea's house.
Downstairs we viewed the freshly deceased body. Pat O'Shea then called
Danny Layne in California. I was there. I heard the conversation. I witnessed
it all. Through the years the Cult has learned that you don't ever call
the Police in a situation like this. (Rick
Ross/Church of God Restoration)
The proper evasive technique must be to call the ambulance. However,
if the ambulance was called now then CPR would be administered, which
would be against their beliefs. The decision between both Pastors was
to let the body cool down before that phone call would be made.
We intentionally waited for about an hour before Pat O'Shea called Danny
Layne back. Locked in my mind is still the sights and experience of how
O'Shea had one hand on the phone, while his other hand was on the forehead
of the corpse. He was telling Danny Layne, that the body has cooled down
now. Next the decision was made to carry my sleeping children out of
this house, over to O'Shea's house right next door before calling the
Police. They need to hide all evidences or any other diversions of interest
If the body has been dead for at least an hour, would you agree with
me that it would be deceptive to call 911 then? I remember a Policeman
telling O'Shea that it appeared that the body has been dead for a while.
He then asked why wasn't 911 called any sooner?
If Pat O'Shea would have practiced what he preached from the pulpit,
he would have told them that he intentionally cooled the body down so
no CPR could be done. Instead he deceived and derailed them by saying
that his family and church members were quickly called to decide what
to do next. It was because everyone had to wake up and get dressed, before
we could decide to call 911. A little time must have slipped by in that
It was at that moment that I realized I am involved with a group whose
ministry is the best forked-tongue deceivers I have ever seen. He didn't
lie by telling the authorities false information. He just derailed them
by giving true information and worded it in such a way to make them think
that life was a scramble around here before they came. Truth was we sat
and just waited for about an hour for the body to cool down.
Shortly before Pat O'Shea ripped my family apart, he and I had several
discussions or moderate arguments. I remember confronting him of the
deceptive comment he made to the Police that night. His reply to me about
that, was that he doesn't really remember exactly the conversation any
more and what was said to make any comment now.
Stop and think now of a half an hour conversation
you had with someone at least a year or two ago. Can you write down
every word, word for word, the entire conversation , as if it had been
edited from a tape recording" No?
Then you (according to the Cult) could honestly "fork tongue" it,
by saying you don't really remember exactly what was said. It is "Cult" truth,
regardless that it is deceptive and designed to derail the thinking pattern
of the inquirer.
Also the concept of the thinking pattern is hinging on multiple definitions
for a word or differentiated between several words which we would consider
the same. They are professionals at it, since they don't lie and capable
of derailing the elite. (Matthew 24:24) They even program the children
to be able to speak this crafty and deceptive language.
I was part of it and know & had seen some of
their deceptive ways. However, about two months ago, even my five children
just about derailed me. During a time when I had them, they tried reproving
me for labeling their group as a Cult and asked me why I did that.
I started listing my reasons and as soon as I mentioned that the group
beats their children, they immediately started arguing that it wasn't
They insisted that they don't ever remember Mommy beating them. I said
I remember Mom beating all of you several times. No, Mommy has never
beat us. I couldn't believe it. Have they simply forgotten the instances?
Or are they lying now? But the group doesn't lie, for you go to hell
if you do!
"Rachel, don't you remember the time that Mom beat all
of you for not going to bed that one time? No, I don't remember, Mom
ever beating us. Rachel, did you forget how you jumped back and forth
across the pillow end of the bed while Mom raced around the foot end
of the bed beating you once or twice before you jumped to the other side?
Mom, never beat us!"
Suzy, did you forget too, how Mommy beat you in the bathroom? I don't
remember Mom ever beating me. How can the facts be forgotten? What kind
of brainwashing happened? How did they forget my vivid memories?
Steve, did you also forget how you were beat black and blue by Mom? Mom
didn't beat me. Crazy! I was exhausted from trying to remind them of
all the abuse I remember so clearly. How could the Cult train my children
to lie without feeling guilty or did the Cult somehow make their memory
Then by accident and not by wisdom on my part, I
changed my wording. So children, you all are convinced that you never
got a spanking in your life? It was then that they said, "Well,
spanking is different. The Bible even instructs to spank."
By accident I cracked this forked-tongue deception and derailment. The
Cult refers to themselves as the Saints. If a Saint inflicts pain to
a child to curb them to go to heaven , it is not a beating. They might
inflict pain to the child until they are black and blue or maybe even
break their bones, but that will not be considered to be a beating. Beatings
are done by people that don't join their group., but it is never done
by one of them.
Now what about the forked-tonguedness in the area of sickness or death?
This pertains to the Suicide
and Murder article. I received an Email
from someone that asked me if I had anymore information on Jerry Tinsman.
They were told that Jerry was born with some rare heart weakness or ailment.
People with that heart problem rarely get very old. And then the comment
or indication was made that Jerry actually died from heart complications.
Could that be the truth? Deception?
What would happen to you, if you slashed your wrists and let your blood
drain out? With or without that born heart weakness, would you die from
heart complications? Yes, the heart would have complications trying to
pump blood that isn't there.
Read the Rick
Ross articles on the baby's death
and where they said, "We
didn't know how sick the child was." To the untrained normal person,
the compelling reaction to that comment is to feel sorry for them. They
didn't know, they made a mistake. However, I was in Kenosha when Danny
Layne was holding church services there for a week when he requested
urgent prayer. He told the congregation that unless the Saints get a
hold of God, that baby could die, which it did a few days later.
So how can a person evaluate what their left tongue was actually saying?..
without lying? None of us know the exact minute we will die. Someone
of us reading this article could drop dead from a heart attack the next
minute. Many Cancer victims didn't know they were sick until they were
infested with it. None of us therefore know how sick we are to be able
to proclaim that they will live another minute, another year, or another
decade. We can only guess at how sick we are, but that was not the question
asked or answer given.
The group is also very secretive. Most of the violations, conflicts,
or confrontations with the law or others are secrets. and kept from the
typical member. One of their preachers, Susan Mutch had a medial C-section.
Listen to a small bit of her style of preaching in Judgments to Come.
I understand that she had been in labor for a long time, and conditions
were getting serious. She would have died that day if it hadn't been
for her husband and what the Cult calls a back sliding minister. They
rushed her to the hospital in time to save her life, but too late for
the baby. I have a lot of respect for those two men., regardless that
the Cult condemns them. The part that is typical for the Cult is that
most of their group doesn't know about it.
The part of the group that knows about it like myself,
probably never heard the details. How and when did the baby die? etc.
Did the baby die when Susan Mutch was still in control and responsible
for her decision concerning the Baby and the Medical status on it.
Or did it die later when she was almost dead and "rescued" by
those two men that have been Cult rejected for it? Has the Baby's
death ever been investigated? My opinion is that if anybody should
be charged with the baby's death, it should be the one that refused
or rejected medical attention and not the rescuers.
Another violation of their dating rules and the two teenagers that broke
them, is very secret too. The pastor of the Kenosha's Cult is Pat O'Shea,
who has a son named Bill. The assistant pastor was James DeGraffenreid,
who had a daughter named Laura. Bill and Laura had an attraction for
each other and broke one of the rules on the sheet, (that Pat O'Shea
denies). O'Shea said that there are NO rules for his congregation! Ask
him then why was some serious unrest and decisions being made during
that time? At first either the DeGraffenreids or the O'Shea's needed
to move to some other congregation.
O'Shea was seriously considering to move to Louisiana. The outcome was
that they took Laura and shipped her away by plane to California to stay
in a Cult member's home there.
James DeGraffenreid a few years earlier left his wife, Brenda, in Lebanon,
MO. when she decided not to follow the Cult and it's ways. Anyway, when
Brenda made her typical phone call to her children in Kenosha, she couldn't
reach Laura and wasn't told of where she was. James withheld the information
and so she called the Kenosha Police, I believe.
I was there when the Police came and searched the
house. They couldn't find her. James withheld the information from
the police too. The Cult leaders even withheld it from us too, and
therefore I couldn't even give the secret information to the Police.
That is the way the Cult operates secretly and by shipping people in "trouble" to
another state. Read the Rick
Ask Pat O'Shea why did all of this happen, if it wasn't for the boyfriend/girlfriend
violation. If it wasn't for the breaking of the rules, why did that happen?
Within a short time Laura basically said bologna with this and went back
to her mother in MO. Apart from the Cult ministry do you think even 1%
of it's members ever heard of the Bill and Laura love affair that got
caught for passing each other notes? But there are no rules!? Did he
mean that there are No rules for their preachers to lie?
I thought how appropriate, portrayed is their whole program, when I saw
their website. I checked up on it one time earlier and saw their home
page. It consisted of some writing of how they are seeking for the sincere
and honest souls, which was right underneath a picture. On top was this
picture of a mountain peak in the clouds with a city built on it.
Oh, how pretty or should I say pretty deceptive? why? Because the
picture was incomplete from the way I first saw it. I remembered it with
a lot of churches named below that cloud. However, if they installed
the entire picture, it might shy way the fish they are trying to catch.
But that is the way they operate. Throwing out partial truth and fragments
to catch or derail according to their deceptive motives. Check out the
full picture on page three of the Nov-Dec
After I started installing their propaganda on my web site I have been
dropped from their mailing list. Also, I couldn't find the half-picture
anymore on their site.
If you are a seeker and ask whatever question to them, they probably
will deceitfully respond like that half-picture, half-truth and give
you the above cloud answer that you actually want to hear. However, below
the surface is the full truth which you will not see, because they purposely
deceptively (fork-tongue), are urging you to bite that derailment hook...
and then they caught you!
Did they catch you? They appear nice, tender and
harmless. They seem "Honest
as the day is long" (North Pole, December Day!) They have a lot
of good stuff, truth and a lot of nice people. However, they have deceptively
caught and derailed a lot of people, including Police, Investigators,
Reporters and Judges.
How many have they derailed? It doesn't appear that the Canadian Judge
Eleanor Schnall (Rick Ross articles) has been derailed.
However, others like Judge Mary K. Wagner have been caught, derailed
and are catering to the Cults desires. Each time somebody new is caught
and derailed, it usually creates another victim and more blood on the
hands of the Cult.
Suppose the newly caught individual (recruit) is
married and their spouse does not like the ways of the Cult, there
is "blood-shed" waiting
to happen. Many marriages and families are ripped apart because the counseling
of the ministry of this Cult has told one of the spouses to leave the
other. My marriage was not the first or the only one destroyed by them.
The list is long and probably over a hundred that they have split or
tried to split. In Kenosha alone, of the five marriages represented in
that congregation, three of them are busted up because of the Cult. (My
Ex. is one of the three) Is that of God?
Looking back I now realize that my marriage was
planned for destruction by the Cult when I wrote a certain article
and gave it to the ministry. The article was using the Bible and intellectual
reasoning to debunk their core beliefs and teachings that they are
the one and only true church. They used often the verse - "Try
the spirit...," and
challenged you to try it on them. I did, and found them short and lacking
from the truth. They didn't like my Try
the Spirit article and knew
that they had to silence me because I was a harmful free-thinker and
dangerous to their group and agenda. My timeline
article was about
things that began there after.
So now I warned you not to believe the surface words
they say and use. Also don't be deceived and derailed by their many
good and nice things they portray. Go visit their services and they
will be eager to go out of their way to serve you with smiles, food,
beverages (not caffeine though!) and answers that keep them usually
looking attractive to you... If they suspect that you might bite their
hook and start following them. They might even put the word "Brother" or "Sister" in
front of your name. Does not that bait look good?
But don't be deceived. That title and your salvation immediately gets
put on a piece of velcro and put on the front of your shirt. If you don't
cooperate according to their rules the way they think you should both
of those velcro things are removed very quickly by them. and then your
troubles begin by agonizing mentally over if they removed the interior
relationship you had with God before you met that group. The outcome
is usually a full scale derailment. The velcro idea I gave will be denied
by them. Read the Mar-April
issue, page six, and then when they deny
the velcro comment, consider if they are liars.
Finally, I would like to explain the left-tongue
possibility of some real, non fiction, specific, right tongue statements.
You can find the "New" reformed
Church Statements in the Rick Ross files, in the Church
alters position on care, discipline article. Note that there are two sets of "Whereas
followed with "resolved."
It sounds so beautiful to hear the right-tongue
say, "the ministry
shall advise the parents/guardians of their legal requirements and allow
seeking of medial means for the child according to the law of the land."
Now left-tongue and questions.
Some of the definitions for "advise" is
to give counsel to offer an opinion all the way to recommend. However,
when the right tongue spoke, how many of us believed or wanted to believe
that the replacement word for advise was a more aggressive word like
--encourage, urge or demand to seek medical attention? But that is
not what it is saying, in fact the sentence runs out of steam and actually
separates the sentence in two parts.
The first part could mean, they give you an opinion of your legal requirements...
which you know anyway. The second part is the allowing to get medical
help. Are they saying that they didn't allow it before? They allowed
it before, if you didn't mind being considered a weak Christian among
the group. You could do it then and you can do it now. What part of the
new reform has changed?
Let us look at the second part (whereas/resolved).
Read the whereas part that they are abhorred at child abuse. Their
left-tongue immediately differentiates that inflicting pain upon a
child, with a wide range of "tools," by
the hands of a Saint, to curb the child to heaven;.. it is Not abuse
or considered a Beating. It is simply discipline and a heavenly training
regardless if the child gets black & blue marks. They would consider
it abuse, if the parent didn't inflict pain to try to curb the child
from hell bound behavior.
Now read the paragraph-long sentence of the "Resolved." Once
again the weak word advise and not enforce or demand, is being used.
Did the word "spanking" get a substitute word that gets their
approval and spanking and beating categorized as the same? How often
is the "last resort?" Spanking under the new reform has to
be done in a loving way, without anger, "along with the rest of
the paragraph. Before this new reform did they spank in a hateful way,
with much anger? What part of this whole thing has changed? Have some
of the definitions maybe changed?
I am just curious at how many authorities have been derailed by this
smoothly worded, new reform statement. They impress me at how they can
do that, without using or giving false information which would be a lie.
And don't forget, they don't lie. It is your fault for misunderstanding